A Racial Nationalist Viewpoint


Speech by Karl Hand, Rome, Georgia, April 23, 2016

     I would like to sincerely thank the sponsors of this event for the invitation to speak here today.  I consider it a rare opportunity to introduce the Racial Nationalist Party of America to you good people of Georgia, explain our purpose, and address some of the issues of the day. I normally speak extemporaneously, but I  want to be able to provide a transcript for our people, that way, those who can not hear this address, will be able to read it.  This in effect will circumvent any attempt at distortion or censorship by our enemies which they are so fond of.  Furthermore, time constraints will probably prohibit me from delivering the entire address.  For your convenience, we are also posting this on our website.

     Before beginning let me say that there are a number of different organizations represented here and that as such, even though we agree on many principles, we may differ on other matters, matters ranging from historical perspective to tactics.  There is a reason why different organizations do exist in the pro-white movement: we have different views and different approaches.   The Left likes to see us as one monolithic group, but that is hardly the case and we’ll leave it up to you, the audience, to draw the distinctions.  Suffice it to say, despite the fact that these differences do exist, the guiding principle of the RNPA in regard to other pro-white groups is that we are a friend to all and an enemy to none.  We are in competition with no one, save ourselves, and we encourage Party self-criticism for this purpose.  In this regard we have three words that serve as our guideposts: performance, performance and performance. We strive to do the little things, do them often and do them well.  

     When we started the RNPA we resolved that we would never be a slave to any constituency.  We say and publish things that make some people mad, even in the pro-white movement, and that’s ok.  That is what freedom is all about.  As a political movement, we have to define ourselves.  In some cases that means breaking with the past.  This allows us to find the seams that permit us to traverse into new areas, to deal with new challenges,  and to navigate the many obstacles placed in our path.  In this regard we view ourselves as problem solvers, first we recognize the problem, and then we proceed from there looking for solutions. 

     Let me state that I did not come here to offend or insult anyone.  I view myself a guest in Georgia and I will not abuse that right and privilege.  Also,  I did not come here to tell you what to believe, but only to tell you what we in the RNPA believe and to provide you with our view of the issues at hand. You are of course free to disagree, to contradict, and to object to anything and even everything I say.  Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Associate Justice of the Supreme Court  said, “If there is any principle of the Constitution that more imperatively calls for attachment than any other it is the principle of free thought - not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought we hate.”

     It is important that we all remember that Freedom of Speech consists of not only our right to speak, but your right to hear what the speaker is saying.  The Supreme Court has ruled that there is no right to a Heckler’s Veto.  In other words, although heckling is permitted by the First Amendment, it must not infringe on someone else’s right to be able to hear what the speaker is saying.  If you really and truly have something important to say, I would argue that that can be done simply by applying for your own permit and holding your own rally.  That way everyone has their say and civil debate and discourse is upheld. 

     The RNPA was started back in 1998.  From that beginning we incorporated two main party  directives.  The first of these two directives is that we are a legal organization.  We take profound pride in the fact that the RNPA has not been the subject of any criminal charges.  

     The second party directive is that we refrain from interviews.  We recognize that the media is inherently anti-white and globalist in nature, and therefore, we can only regard them as a hostile force.  For this reason, we have set out to create our own media, with a presence on the internet, which I have already referenced, the publication of a bi-monthly newsletter, White Voice, (Exhibit No.1) and with the publication of over sixty leaflets.

     To grant interviews to the enemy press is to legitimize them and allow them to present themselves as a moral arbiter. This of course is an absurd proposition.  They have their own stereotypes, biases and agenda,  and they simply lack the professionalism and skill set to get beyond that. That said, we are not afraid of the media, they are afraid of us, but more, they are afraid of you.  That is why they will never publish an article that is objective and untainted by their own bias, or the prejudices of our enemies.  They do not trust you to come to your own conclusions, to weigh the evidence, to think for yourselves.  They are ruled by fear, and they want others to be ruled by this fear.  By contrast, we have resolved that we will never be a slave of fear, no matter the consequences. 

     Our motto is, “Oderint dum Metuant”, let them hate, so long as they fear, and it is they who will learn to fear us.  To all of our enemies we say this, whether you be the snarky journalists who now inhabit that field, or those who occupy the highest seats of power, or those who meander down the decaying halls of Academia, we have but one message:  We expect no quarter, we get no quarter, and when the time comes, we will give no quarter!

     As a movement we must learn the art of governance.  To accomplish this we must learn to measure our words and our actions.  To this end we must learn discipline.  George Washington said that “Discipline is the soul of an army.  It makes small numbers formidable, procures success to the weak, esteem to all.”   It is therefore imperative that all members adhere to our two party directives, from the highest levels on down.   This is what we refer to as Party Discipline, not to be confused with any military or paramilitary inference.

      Because of our reluctance to engage in these media games, it is probably very likely you have not heard of the RNPA before this, so I will try to enlighten you regarding our party as best I can with what time is allowed. 

RNPA Programs:

     There are a number of programs that the RNPA undertakes which I would like to introduce you to.  The first of these is called Operation Gatherstone(Exhibit No. 2) which is our random mailing program.  Basically, we encourage people to send out leaflets to names in the public phone book.  What we hope to do is create a sea-change in the way people think.  We see ourselves as the Johnny Appleseeds of white resistance.  With Operation Gatherstone we are planting the seeds that will sprout and grow into a powerful movement that will sweep away the rot and decay of this aged and liberal society.  Indeed, the RNPA is evolving into a propaganda powerhouse, and as this propaganda machine grows, our impact will also grow, and the power of the enemy will thus be diminished.  It is but a fading whisper. 

     Another program that we undertake is our very popular White Christmas Drive.  For this we have two co-sponsors, Aryan Syndicate out of Syracuse New York, and Blood and Iron, out of Oklahoma City.  Basically the White Christmas Drive is a program to help needy  White kids and elderly over the Christmas holiday.  This brings us a lot of joy, as we like to envision some needy white kids getting more than they ever expected to get, and hopefully as they reflect on it years from now they will be able to call that the ‘Best Christmas Ever’.  When we initially started the WCD, it was designated for needy White kids only, however, a need was made known for the elderly, so we added them to the program. This is a national event and is growing every year. This year will be our 17th year that we are doing this. 

     Another program we are extremely proud of is what we call R.A.I.N, which is an acronym for Rise Above It Now.   This is our anti-drug program.  We recognize that drugs are a serious and growing problem for young whites.  In fact, we saw this developing long before it started to make the evening news.  We do not see drug abuse as a victimless crime.  We see it affecting those within the immediate radius of each and every drug abuser.  It is kind of like second-hand smoke.  Recent reports see a correlation between drug abuse and child abuse.  It has been reported that if current levels persist in Niagara County, where we are headquartered,  it could see upwards of 4,100 cases of child abuse.  That is just one county and in just one year!  In Erie County, immediately south of Niagara County, a recent report stated that there was an average of 11 deaths per week from opioids.  Meanwhile, according to the CDC, nearly half a million Americans died from drug overdoses between 2000 and 2014.  Over 47,000 deaths were recorded last year, mostly due to opioid  pain relievers and heroin.  These deaths rose with an alarming 14% increase in just one year according to the CDC’s “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. This is not simple drug abuse, this is more like the Black Plague, or the Zombie Apocalypse. 

      This affects all strata of our society, and its deleterious effects are not limited to harder drugs.  As tragic as the deaths and child abuse associated with drug abuse are, there are other societal costs.  A Swedish study found that heavy pot use in the teen years may predict later-life disability, with marijuana users more likely to end up on the nation’s disability rolls by age 59. 

     It is easy to state one’s opposition to drugs, but this is a problem that has no easy solution, there is no magic wand.  One thing we are certain of is that this is not something that requires more legislation.  We do not need tougher laws, what we need are tougher people, people strong enough to resist the siren’s call of drug abuse. 

     The last thing we need is for some politician to attach themselves to this crusade to win some political points.  We see that kind of shallowness as repugnant and doing a disservice to this noble cause.   As leaders of the White community it is our most sacred duty and responsibility to inspire our folk to greatness.  We see the lure of drugs as a testament to the failure of a materialist based society.  Whereas, the present system tries to bring every one down to the lowest common denominator, we seek to raise them up.  Instead of scolding our young, we seek to create an awareness as to the consequence of falling prey to the drug culture.  To fight this menace we  use  positive reinforcement and passive peer pressure.

Many people fall into drug abuse because of peer pressure, so our strategy is to create our own peer pressure.  We see drug abusers as victims of a society that is soulless and ruled by greed, a society without true direction or purpose.  Make no mistake, this is not an easy challenge, it takes time and effort to bring about a change in the mindset that leads to drug abuse.  But this is the only civilized and humane approach.  Locking people up in prison and forgetting about them, casting them aside like they were so much trash, is not acceptable, in the opinion of the RNPA. 

     As a movement, we must commit ourselves to this with vigor, and then recommit ourselves again, remaining ever vigilant that failing to do so, will cause us to backslide into acceptance.  Consequently, this is a challenge that can only be addressed with success by a historical movement, not by some politician that sees this as some opportunity to increase his polling numbers and to grab a headline.   We want and desire a happy and healthy Aryan race and that is our only motivation.  It saddens and disheartens us to see our folk falling victim to this creeping menace, and we feel we must act upon it.

     Another RNPA  program is our prisoner outreach program which we have dubbed “Operation Bootstrap”.  As its name implies, it seeks to inspire white inmates to lift themselves up, by the bootstraps, if you will.  It is closely associated with R.A.I.N., as many of the people who find themselves in prison, do so because of drug abuse.  Just as it is disturbing to hear some of the stories from these people, it is equally uplifting to hear of them coming to the realization that it was drug abuse that made a mess of their lives, and that they want to change it.  As part of Operation Bootstrap, we provide free subscriptions to White Voice, up to 300 inmates, per year, which is within our present budgetary limits.  Some inmates subscribe on their own, and some, even contribute to our White Christmas Drive.  We even have inmates that take up collections of stamps from other inmates to assist in the mailing of Christmas gifts. 

     Additionally, the RNPA participates in elections, usually in the form of encouraging citizens to use the write-in process as a solution to what we see as the two party swindle.  To us, the Democratic Party is the party of treason, and the Republican Party is the party of surrender.  We see the election  process as an opportunity to educate our people to ideas they have not had the option of ever hearing, without prejudice.

     As I mentioned, we started the RNPA back in 1998.  We chose that name for good reason, as it encapsulates our world view.  In short, we don’t have to explain ourselves, which means we can address other matters of concern, some of which I hope to mention here today.  Additionally, anyone can be a Racial Nationalist.  A Black who is a Racial Nationalist is often referred to as a Black Nationalist, and we in fact offer a leaflet entitled, The Truth About Black Nationalism. (Exhibit No. 3 )  


     The name that our enemies most frequently use to describe us is “racist”,  and we have been asked many times if we are in fact  “racists”.  We always answer that with the question, how do you define “racist”?  The first thing in a debate that one should try to do, is to define the terms.  Let me state here very clearly, that if you define a racist as a person who seeks to oppress, exploit or harm another race, then we are not racists.  However, if you define a person who is proud of their racial heritage, its accomplishments, then yes, we are racists. 

     I should tell you something about myself.  You see, I was raised on a farm for about 8  years, from when I was like 7 to 15.  The nearest black family was 3 miles away.  I could have cared less, one way or the other about blacks.  In fact, I can recall hearing James Brown the first time on TV.  I had to go into the living room to see what was going on, and to be honest, watching him gave me chills.  But then they panned the audience and I saw all these white eyes, as this was a night  performance, and although I found him exciting as a performer, I knew instinctively, that that was not for me.  That didn’t mean I didn’t listen to black music.  I had Little Richard, Bo Didley and Ike and Tina Turner records.  I even went to a rock-n-roll revival show that featured Chuck Berry, Bo Didley, Ruby and the Romantics, and Little Eva - all blacks.  But I eventually concluded that integration led to miscegenation, or race-mixing, which is what happened in both India and Egypt, and that  this would mean the death of the White Race.  In this regard, we in the RNPA have concluded that Integration is the ruination of our nation.  The answer to America’s race problem is separation not assimilation through integration!

     This does not mean that we in the RNPA consider blacks our enemy, quite the contrary, we see them as potential allies against the power elites who rule over us and who seek to pile drive us into equal squares and shapes, so that they can consolidate their power.   The problem before us stems from a lack of racial respect, but that respect must be such that it does not require surrender by one side or the other.   Rather, we see that God and/or nature created different races and the preservation of them is a concern that we should share.

     Let me tell you about two such men.  One of these men was Earnest Sevier Cox.  Cox was a white supremacist who wrote the book White America.  He also wrote an essay entitled, The South’s Part In Mongrelizing America.  He was also a personal friend of Marcus Garvey, a Black Nationalist of his day who led over 2 million fellow blacks in an effort to relocate Blacks either back to Africa or to the Caribbean.   Needless to say, this solution to the race problem did not sit well with the power elites, who then railroaded Garvey to prison. 

     You see, the desire to realize global domination is NOT new, and the Globalists can not achieve that goal without first genetically enslaving the White race and Western Civilization, as they are viewed as obstacles to that quest.  Racial division is a major stumbling block to the globalists who live in their mansions and protected environs while ruling over those who they view with disdain and contempt.

  With technology advancing the way it is, these globalists are about to realize their dream, and IF they do, it will be serfdom for all of posterity, black, white or brown. This threat of technology is what Edward Snowden tried to warn us about, and it is why they hate and despise him.  That is not to say that Snowden is a Racial Nationalist.  What it does say, is that, the surveillance state is real and a threat to all of us.

      Let me ask you this, do you really think that if these elitists ever get that kind of power, the kind of power that technology can provide them, that they will ever willingly relinquish that power and control?  We think not.  This is why we support the 2nd Amendment, because we believe that without the second amendment there is no first amendment.  The 2nd Amendment is not about some person’s right to shoot Bambi.  It is about freedom, and the maintaining of that freedom.  Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government."  It boggles my mind that some of the same people who are deeply concerned about the surveillance state, as they should be, are the same ones supporting legislation to curtail the 2nd Amendment.  The exception to this is the Leftist, hacker group Anonymous who put out a very pro 2nd Amendment video.  Much of what Anonymous says and does we find repulsive, but for that, we applaud them.


     Another word that is thrown around recklessly to describe any Whites who have any racial pride and backbone is “Hater”.  I recall my mother telling me that when someone points a finger at you, they are pointing three back at themselves.  (DEMONSTRATE).    See!

     So, let me tell you something that occurred to me at a demonstration back up in Buffalo, New York, a couple of years back.  A young White, college-aged kid with red hair came up to me and matter-of-factly stated that he thought the White race was the cause of all the world’s problems.  This kind of racial self-loathing is typical of today’s white liberals and it makes you wonder where this kind of hatred originates.  It’s almost a case of self-flagellation, a practice by some religious cults where the adherents beat themselves with whips or chains.  Indeed, that is what liberalism has become - a religious cult.  If you do not subscribe to their beliefs, you are deemed a heretic and they stone you, if not with actual stones, then with words, accusations and names. 

     Dr. David Yeagley, was a college professor at Oklahoma State University who taught humanities and psychology.  He had degrees from Yale, Emory , Oberlin University and the University of Hartford.  He was also a member of the Comanche Tribe in Lawton, Oklahoma.  He once wrote an article entitled, “It’s a Warrior Thing, You wouldn’t understand”.

I would like to give you some quotes from that article now,

….. “We Indians are supposed to hate the White man.  Everyone tells me this.  I’ve heard it from Whites, Blacks and even Indians. Well folks, I hate to disappoint you, but I like White people just fine.  To tell the truth, I rather admire them and their fascinating history.”

     ….. “If my ancestors had been strong enough, they would have taken the White man’s land, instead of the other way around.  And they wouldn’t have felt guilty about it afterwards.  You wouldn’t have seen any defeated White people getting affirmative action from Comanches.”

….. “The White man may have taken my land, but he did it fair and square.  Yes, he treated my people harshly, but he never denied their bravery, never besmirched their memory as warriors.”

     The first question that beckons is this: just who is telling young Whites, and Indians, and Blacks to hate White people???   I’ll tell you who - the very ones who dare call us haters, that’s who!

    The second question is: why are they encouraging this anti-White hatred??  To what end do they hope to accomplish??     And, if you have an inquisitive mind, perhaps you should ask yourself this:  What is this fascinating history of Whites that Dr. Yeagley wrote about, and why wasn’t any of this ‘fascinating’ white history taught to you by your instructors?? 

     These are questions that take up too much time to answer in this forum, but the RNPA can certainly help you in finding the answers to them.  That is, after all, our primary mission, to educate our folk.

     I would like to identify some of the real haters, and I will use their own words for you to weigh and judge for yourselves.    

     Bahar Mustafa, a diversity officer at Goldsmiths, University of London, first attracted international attention when she barred white men from an event on “diversifying” the curriculum.  Days later she was embroiled when she came out advocating White genocide. 

     That was in England, however, here in the US these anti-White tirades are not uncommon. For instance, Dr. Saida Grundy, a black professor at Boston University, tweeted that: “why is White America so reluctant to identify white college males

as a problem population?”   and “dear White people: u are all Ben Affleck, those euphemisms for ur ancestors like ‘Farmers’ and ’pioneers’ means owned humans & killed natives.”    

     In Raleigh, North Carolina, Dr. Kamau Kambon, the owner of a bookstore told a panel at Howard University Law School that the solution to many of the problems faced by black people is the extermination of “White people off the face of the planet.”   Dr. Kambon taught African Studies 241 in the Spring of 2005 semester at North Carolina State University.  

     The Jew professor, Noel Ignatiev, who taught at the Massachusetts College of Art and Design received a standing ovation when he said, “If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live.  You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world!  They only murder, exploit and oppress non-Whites!  At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby, but what can a white man do?”  

     That was back in November of 2013, but Ignatiev has been spreading his anti-white hatred as far back as 2002 when  he argued in Harvard Magazine that “abolishing the White race” was so “desirable that some may find it hard to believe” that anyone other than “committed White supremacists” would oppose it.

     Johann Burkhard Mencken wrote of the Charlantry of the Learned, but this nonsense does not even rise to that level.  What we are witnessing in our universities today is the Charlantry of the Stupid, a byproduct of this subliminal hatred directed against the White race.  This erupts and boils over frequently in arbitrary and freedom-stifling  legislation, and in its more virulent form, in black-on-white crime.  It is Red Academia, with its employment and coddling of Marxist instructors, that is much to blame for this anti-white hatred that we are witnessing in our nation today. We must wage total political war against the menace of Red Academia.  We must expose them, we must oppose them, and then, we must bury them and their twisted and hateful ideology, by denying them the funds that they use to undermine and slander us.  They have abused the trust we placed in them, and instead of the education of our youth, they have given us the indoctrination of our youth,  to a point that they reject and hate their own heritage. To quote Thomas Jefferson:  “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”  We say that it is time to expose Red Academia for the menace it is, and work to deny them the funds of our own destruction.

      The espousing of this anti-White hatred is nothing new.  In the 1960s you had one of the leaders of the Black Panther Party, Elderidge Cleaver, the author of “Soul on Ice” spout similar trash.  In it Cleaver boasted of raping White women.  This is what he wrote:  “Rape was an insurrectionary act.  It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the White man’s law, upon his system of values and that I was defiling his women.”   Today, one in four college women are sexually abused.  America is second only to South Africa as the rape capital of the world.  Here are some rape statistics, over six consecutive years, from 2003 to 2008:

Black on White: 135,206
Black on Black: 148,380

White on Black: 0

      Cleaver’s literary credits were not limited to Soul on Ice.  He also wrote the introduction to “Do It”, the trashy literary work of Jerry Rubin, a self-described Communist Jew.  Like many a Communist Jew after him, Rubin worked for the establishment press, The Cincinnati Post and Times-Star, before embarking  on a partnership with his fellow Jew, Abbie Hoffman in starting the Youth International Party or Yippies.  It was Hoffman who told his audience of mostly white youth to “Go home and kill your parents.”    

     You see, the RNPA is a movement that speaks with authority.  This is an authority that is not granted to us by the state, it is an authority not granted to us by the media, rather, it is an authority granted to us by knowledge.  We do not condemn our enemies, their own words and deeds condemn them!            

Black Repatriation:

     I do want to address some current events before I conclude this address, but first I must address our Black Repatriation program.  Let me begin by stating in the strongest terms as possible that we are NOT talking about a dumping operation.  Furthermore this would be strictly voluntary and would consist of a rewards and incentive program.  In other words, we would seek to gain the cooperation of blacks.  The first step in this would be the creation of alliances between White and Black Nationalists.  Both would work in their respective communities to build support for this program.  When the proper time comes, a Bureau of African Relocation would be established.  It would seek to gain the cooperation of one or more African nations, and would follow this up with establishing a relocation process.  What is the ‘proper time’ you ask?  The answer to that is simple: when sufficient support has been generated in both the black and white communities to force the political establishment to act. 

     Actually, some blacks, have already taken it upon themselves to begin this process, without even having any rewards or incentives offered to them.   In the April 4th, 2014 edition of the Christian Science Monitor, there appeared an article by Chris Stein entitled, “Back to Africa? For some African-Americans the answer is yes.”  We actually made a leaflet out of this article entitled “Africa Calling.”  (Exhibit No. 4) I would like to read you some quotes from some Blacks who actually made that decision as I found it enlightening as I am certain that you will too.

          Jimmy Thorne relocated to Ghana in Africa.  Thorne claims that this was the best decision he ever made.  Since he moved there he found a wife, reconnected to God and plays golf daily.  This is what Thorne was quoted as saying: “Once you accept it as your home, why wouldn’t you stay in your home?  This is where we came from originally, so maybe that’s why we’re here.  Maybe it’s divine providence.”

         Imahkus Okofu moved to Ghana over 20 years ago from New York City.  He runs a health spa in his African homeland.  He has authored a number of books on black repatriation.  This is what he had to say: “Wherever it is we find ourselves, in Africa is where we should be.” 

          Another who relocated to Ghana in 2011 is Otis Davis.  He is president of the African-American Association, an organization that assists others who have repatriated.  His son visited him, and now he plans to stay.  This is what his son said, “It’s not really just about money, you have the ability to create something...to contribute.” 

          As you can see, by those three quotes, what we are advocating is not some cruel or inhumane operation.  Our main challenge here is to sell American blacks that this is best for them, indeed, it is best for both races.  Abraham Lincoln, who is known as the Great Emancipator was a proponent of Black repatriation.  In an Address on Colonization to a Deputation of Negroes in Washington, D.C. on August 14,1862 this is what Lincoln had to say:   "You and we are different races.  We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races.  Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them living among us, while ours suffer from your presence.  In a word we suffer on each side.  If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated."

     Indeed, we both suffer.  I am asking Blacks to put aside their hatred for the White man and to visualize a nation where they have their own flag, their own Constitution, their own system of government, their own judges, their own police, and yes, even their own Academy Awards.  There would be no more Fergusons, there would be no more Baltimores.  There would be none of this back and forth, none of this victim mentality that restricts a person, a race,  and a society.  All, we in the RNPA are asking of you is to think about it.

     I should point out something that our friends in the NAACP may have forgotten.  It was one of their co-founders, W.E.B. Dubois who  was one of the first to relocate to Africa.  So, for the NAACP to criticized this rally when it was first announced, I have two words: Start Leading.  Instead of following the racial demagogues  who seek to manipulate, join with the RNPA in this noble endeavor.     

     The question that comes next is of course how would we pay for the rewards and incentives that I mentioned earlier, and that is a fair and reasonable question.  Let me tell you this, as of right now, depending on who you listen to, the United States has upwards of 737 military bases, in 63 countries.  There are 845,441 buildings and equipments, covering nearly 30 million acres.  The RNPA believes in a strong defense, but we do not accept the notion that we should be the policeman of the world.  The kind of expenditures that are required to maintain this kind of world presence is not only unprecedented, it is outrageous.  Of course, if you believe in the globalist doctrine with its military-industrial adventurism, then this makes perfect sense to you. However, we believe that this is  not in our best interest as a nation, only in the interest of international corporations, the same profiteers who sold out the American worker with their free trade. Furthermore, just for the record, we believe in American exceptionalism, but not at the barrel of a gun.  Using our military against those who adopt different forms of government, and have different cultures and traditions, only makes us more enemies than friends.  This is what the CIA calls ‘blowback.’

     The US spends more on our defense budget than the next top ten foreign nations, combined, and to what end?  In addition, there is tremendous waste in its day-to-day operations.  We have all heard of the $400 that the military was paying for toilet seats have we not?  Did they never hear of Walmart??  And then there is foreign aid, which totals around 40.11 billion dollars.  One in seven Americans are near or below the poverty line and we are giving money away?  And to carry this even to a more absurd level - they borrow this money to give away, paying interest on it.  Charity begins at home.  The National Alliance to end Homelessness reports that 2.3 to 3.5 million Americans are homeless.  According to the same source, 1.5 million homeless were created by the last recession.  So when some indignant career politician in all his majesty claims that these homeless choose to be on the street, we in the RNPA say, “God damn you and God damn your lies!”  It is absolutely criminal that we should be giving away money to foreign nations, and engaging in foreign wars, while our own suffer. The RNPA argues that as a nation we need to come home America, come home.  We were never meant to be the United Nations, and our troops were never meant to be mercenaries for the oligarchs, racketeers and profiteers who now rule over us, and who smugly look down upon us as if we were their stupid and obedient slaves.

     Of course, the military is not the only source of wasteful spending in Washington.  We have a bloated and extravagant political bureaucracy.  Furthermore, our forefathers never conceived of our nation having 50 states.  We need to cull the number of members of Congress and purge their staff.  If necessary we should consolidate some of the smaller states thus ridding ourselves of this unnecessary baggage.  And most certainly, we should establish term limits for members of Congress.  When this country was founded the life span was around 35, now it is around 70.  We have members of Congress who have been in office and on the public dole for 30 years or more.  They are so detached from the American public that they have no idea on how the average American thinks, what he feels is best for his own country, or how he and his family suffers. 

     Every member of Congress gets $174,000 per year, which is three times the average American’s median salary of $49,000, this according to an article by StreetAuthority, November 22, of 2011.  According to that same article, “members are fully vested after only five years of service and eligible for pension at age 50.”   Furthermore, according to this same article: members of Congress are able to deduct $3,000 from their annual income tax for any expenses incurred outside of their home state or district, free parking at the office and DC airports, child daycare, free meals at the legislative dining hall, and cheap membership to the house gym.  There is also free health benefits, including a waiver from Obamacare which Congress so dutifully forced upon us, and campaign funds can be spent on meals and entertainment for constituents, as well as travel, anytime of the year, whether in session or not.  And for that $174,000 a year that they get, Congress only works 137 days a year.  That’s roughly 2.67 days per week.  Again, this according to StreetAuthority. 

Global Warming:  

     Let me now turn my attention to this thing called Global Warming, but before I do, let me say that too often we get caught up in this Right-Left paradigm.  That is a loser’s game.  We must think beyond the good cop / bad cop sandbox that the system forces us to play in.  The RNPA has more in common with the Right than the Left, but we are also cognizant that the Left is not always wrong.  For instance, they were right about pollution, and they led the fight in arresting that threat, at least here in America.  They are wrong about race, but I think they are motivated by ignorance of racial science in particular, which is denied them,  and history in general. Also, I think they are simply afraid, afraid to offend, and afraid of being targeted by bullies.  That is understandable considering the situation we find ourselves in.

     But do not misunderstand me, much of  The New Left is also made up of pompous and petulant children who embrace sophism as a mother lovingly embraces a new born child.  They think this makes them appear clever and sophisticated, when all it does is prove them dishonest and incapable of rational and civil debate, which is exactly why they turn to bullying and violence. Their arguments are vapid, so they desperately try to silence any and all other opinions. 

      In regard to Global Warming, they are neither right or wrong.  The predictions of Al Gore have been proven false, or premature at best, and then there is evidence that what we are witnessing is not actually Global Warming, but rather a shift in our climate.  For instance, the Left warns us that the Arctic Ice is melting, and it is, but they fail to mention that the Antarctic seems to be expanding.  This according to a study by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Maryland, and the Sigma Space Corporation.

     We must be ever vigilant against the Rise of Demagogues who prey upon people’s fears, some of it being a willful attempt to create a lynch mob mentality with scapegoatism as their main objective, some, with sinister intent to use this as a means to enhance their power.   Science should not be politicized, and should involve reasoned thinking, and methodical procedures.  Jumping to conclusions is not the trait of a scientific mind. 

     The RNPA recognizes that there are changes occurring on our planet.  We are not so sure of the cause or causes, and we don’t think anyone can be.  Furthermore, we think the term ‘Global Warming’ is much too narrow, as we don’t believe that it tells

the whole story.  For this, we prefer the term ‘Earth Changes’.  In fact, the Left is even changing their tune on this, as they no longer speak of global warming so much as Climate Change.

     The notorious volcanic Ring of Fire that encircles the Pacific Ocean appears to be activating with increased activity.  This is accompanied by what appears to be an increase in earthquakes. Some scientists link these changes to an anticipated magnetic polar shift, others to solar activity, and still others to the earth’s rotation.  These things have happened before, and they will happen again, perhaps at an unprecedented rate due to the cooling of our planet’s core, which may affect our magnetic field. 

     The possibility that these Earth Changes may be tied to a shifting magnetic field may be ignored in America’s  media, for some deviant reason, but not all are ignoring it.  For instance, The Daily Mail, from the United Kingdom, (Exhibit No. 5) back in 2011 reported that the shift in the magnetic pole caused authorities in Tampa Bay to change their number-based names due to this magnetic pole shift.  These are some direct quotes from that article: 

“Runways at a Florida airport are to be given brand new numbers, but not for cosmetic reasons - the changes are thanks to movement in the Earth’s magnetic field.”

Changes in our planet’s core are causing the north magnetic pole to speed towards Russia at nearly 40 miles a year.”

     Three years later, in 2014, an article from the BBC (British Broadcasting Corp) News, reported that runways in New Jersey were renamed for the same reason.  (Exhibit No. 6)

     In an article by Renee Lewis entitled: European Space Agency: Magnetic north wandering south toward Siberia (Exhibit No. 7)  some interesting observations were made. Here are a few very revealing quotes that I would like to share with you:

“Earth’s north magnetic pole is drifting south toward Siberia at an accelerating rate, according to data from the European Space Agency (ESA). 

Over the past two centuries, Earth’s magnetic field has weakened by 15%, according to scientists….Risks of a weak magnetic field include more deaths from cancer due to increased radiation, electrical grid collapse from severe solar storms, climate change and temporary ozone holes.” 

     That’s right - climate change!  The question thus becomes, could a shift in our magnetic pole account for other Earth Changes.  Of course it could, simply because of the dynamics involved between the earth’s core, which is where this magnetic field originates, and the earth’s mantle.     

     We could argue all our lives as to the cause or causes of these most recent earth changes.  Whether or not it is a man-made crisis or just a product of nature probably won’t satisfy the debaters on either side, so let us dispense with the that debate, and instead address the question as to the whether or not green energy is desirable or undesirable?  And secondly, we should ask ourselves is it even feasible? 

     It is our position that Green energy is a better source than fossil fuels, for both the environment and because this would take our foreign policy out of the hands of oil barons and the speculators who benefit from it along with the military/industrial complex that ensures the flow of this black gold.  That said, is it feasible?  Ten or twenty years ago that would not be the case simply because of the tremendous amount of coordination that is required, as more than one alternate fuel will have to be employed.    However, today our technology has reached a point where this can be coordinated.  True, there would be some growing pains, that is true in every business venture.  Furthermore, we believe that a change-over could quite possibly encourage economic growth through job creation.  We believe that this change-over could be stimulated through the Small Business Administration.  By offering reduced loans to green energy producing companies, this would encourage a change-over.  This doesn’t require more regulation which stifles growth, only some financial push.  You would be surprised at how rapid this change-over would occur with a little stimulation.  America was built on innovation and adaptability, it will respond to this challenge.  There are some things that we can’t change or escape, short of leaving the planet altogether, but at least our energy needs can be addressed.  I believe that this is one change that we can agree on.  There is one caveat, the RNPA  will never entertain the notion of a global tax for any reason, as we will not empower the same scoundrels who have brought the world perpetual wars, white surrender  and global devastation.  We stand implacably against the Globalists and their megalomaniacal drive for world domination.

     In summary, we feel that Earth Changes are occurring, rather rapidly, but there is not much we can do other than to prepare for it.  To this end, we believe that innovation, and not legislation, is the real solution.  An example of this is happening already in Chicago and reported in the Nov./Dec 2012 issue of Science Illustrated and entitled “A Crowning Achievement” by Ib Solomon.  (Exhibit No. 8)  This article reports on a new trend in cities, specifically Chicago, where they have begun to grown vegetation on building rooftops.  This vegetation does four things: 1) it protects against rain. 2) it lowers summer temperatures. 3) It insulates in the winter. And 4) it saves sewer systems.  And what’s more, it lasts for years.  Again, innovation not legislation!

A Nation of Rulers:

     It is said that America is a nation of laws.  To be truthful, it is a nation of too many laws. There are over 2 million laws on the books today.  This has come about for two reasons, the first being that we as citizens have abdicated our responsibility to lead.  As citizens, we are the actual rulers of America, that is the principle that we were founded on, in defiance of the feudal order that was then in place.  The second reason is that we have too many lawyers in office.  Of course, we can’t legally prevent lawyers from seeking office, that would take another law, and an unconstitutional one at that, but we shouldn’t give their candidacy more weight simply because they happen to be an attorney.  Lawyers in politics create laws, it’s what they do, that’s why they are called lawmakers, but as a nation we should stop demanding new laws every time a new problem or issue arises.  We are slowly binding ourselves into a legal straightjacket. 

     This of course raises another issue which concerns the corruption of the American system, in this case the election system, and that is the segmentation of the electorate.  This allows candidates to appeal to certain groups by dividing the electorate, and thus allowing them to appear  as the unifier, when in fact they were the ones who deliberately divided them in the first place.  The ancient Romans had a saying for this: Divide et impera, or Divide and Conquer

     I’m afraid that all of this has come about because we as citizens have grown lazy.  We allowed it to transpire because we prefer to have someone else do our thinking for us.  Instead of taking the time and effort to listen to candidates, instead of demanding answers, we allow the media to tell us who to vote for.  This, along with the two established political parties, or what we in the RNPA refer to as the two party swindle, has eroded our Republic. 

      As a nation based upon freedom, we should encourage the establishment of Third Parties.  This can only be done by the loosening of election laws, laws that were put in place purposely by the two parties, in order to restrict competition at the election booth.  This has resulted in the Tweedledee and Tweedledum system that we find ourselves faced with every election year. 

     When this country was first founded it was truly a revolutionary idea: a government ruled by its citizens instead of some aristocracy.  That is what was meant by the phrase “All men are created equal”.  It had no racial implications.  Before the founding of this Republic, if you were walking down the street and an aristocrat passed, you were expected to bow, or genuflect.  If you didn’t, you could face retribution.  But after the Revolution, we became a Nation of Rulers and we bow to no one!  Not to the nine old swine on the Supreme Court, not to the communist Usurper who sits in the White House, not to the criminals in the FBI and ATF, and not to, and never to, that Bolshevik hag, Hillary Clinton.

The Lazy American:  

     I have mentioned the lazy citizen, and when one speaks of the laziness, one must address our declining work ethic.  In the RNPA we have a saying: “Hard work is one of the great rewards in life.”   In this regard, we seek to give our best each day where we are employed, to act responsibly, and to do it with integrity.  In the political arena, we see ourselves as outworking our enemies, and outperforming our competitors.  It’s as simple as that.

     Much of the blame for our declining work ethic is often placed on the young, but that is extremely unfair.  I work with a lot of young people.  They hold down jobs, go to school, and study to make decent grades.  That is not being lazy.  They do require high maintenance but that is not being lazy, that is just being young.       The problem often is that today a lot of responsibility is placed on young people that they just aren’t ready for.  It’s part of the maturation process. 

     The changing landscape of our work force has however encouraged laziness.  Instead of manual labor, we have service oriented franchise operations dominating the scene and many young people find entry jobs at these.  Most franchise operators own a franchise because they chose the easy path to ownership.  A franchise takes less planning and commitment to own than if you were to start your own business from scratch.  And many of these owners wrongly assume that a franchise is a turn key operation, thus ignoring the day-to-day operations, and the maintenance that is required in managing a young workforce.  And when something goes wrong they put the blame on someone else - its called displacement.  Oftentimes that is the younger generation who they employ.

     Speaking of young people, many of you may recall the young man who set fireworks off his head last year.  It turned out that he accidentally set them off but nevertheless he did put himself at risk even if he was just goofing around.  Art Markman, a professor of psychology at the University of Texas-Austin, was asked about why young people sometimes do silly and often dangerous things, this is what he said:  “Both peer pressure to do silly things and also the desire to impress others provide strong motivation that can lead young adults to do silly and often dangerous things.” He then went on to explain, “The frontal lobes of the brain help people to stop (or inhibit) behaviors that have been engaged by the motivational system. The frontal lobes do not finish maturing until people are in their early 20s, and so young adults are more prone than older adults” to be motivated by and act on risk behavior.   Consequently, we in the RNPA believe that when dealing with young people it is important for employers, co-workers, political pundits and commentators, to keep this in mind.

     Returning to the question of the work ethic, the work ethic has been eroded mainly by the presence of non-whites.  It is not just their presence, but that employers do not hold them to the same standards as Whites.  This is also true of school administrators who employ two standards of discipline and the judicial system.  This is what is known as “soft bigotry”.  In fact, a well known blog called Vox, which gives a Liberal perspective to policy and politics, did an article on this in an August 19, 2015th article entitled, “Racism in the classroom: The soft bigotry of low expectations is just regular bigotry.”  I found it interesting that a Liberal publication would acknowledge this and found myself wondering if things are not going full circle, that maybe some Liberals were now finally coming to their senses and starting to realize just how damaging Affirmative Action has been.  This damage is demonstrated by  simple comparison.      Look at America, since the implementation of integration and open immigration.  We have gone from the average student science score of being number one in the world to now 17th out of 30 industrialized nations.   In math,  US students ranked 24th out of the same 30 nations.   Predominantly Aryan Finland came in first of the 30 nations, with mestizo Mexico coming in last.  These figures from the 2006 Program for International Student Assessment.  That was in 2006, in 2009 that same group had the US 31st in math and 23rd in science. 

     The common excuse used to explain this decline in education is  lack of education funds - that is pure poppycock!  A voluminous study, nearly 400 pages, by  The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development  - which groups the most developed countries- reports that the US  spends  “more than any other nation covered in the report.”

   This is Liberalism’s gift to America: a nation of imbeciles.  They are too busy preaching their communist dogma and pushing their socialist agenda to give  America’s youth  a proper education. And to compensate, they often engage in cheating on tests.  I’m not talking about the kids, I’m talking about the instructors and school administrators.

     In a recent Gallup poll it was reported that  1 in 5 Americans think that the Sun revolves around the earth.  In another survey one in seven college grads think that Judge Judy is on the Supreme Court.  That’s college graduates my friends.  And get this, only 76% of Americans knew that we won our independence from England.  Some said France, some said Russia, some said China , and some said  Mexico.  Nearly 19%  had no opinion.  How can you have no opinion about who we won our independence from?  It isn’t an opinion-It is a historical fact.


     Often we are asked about Jews.  We do not allow Jews to become members of the RNPA because we feel that it is in their nature to be internationalists, and hence contrary to our views.  We call this The Curse of Diaspora.  We see this as a result of the wanderings of the Jew.  It is this internationalist tendency that we believe caused Jews to be the originators of Communism. Consequently, Jews are regarded as subversive and a threat to the survival or our race and nation.

     In the February 8th, 1920 issued of the Illustrated Sunday Herald, Winston Churchill wrote an article entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism, A Struggle For The Soul Of The Jewish People”.  In that article Churchill contended that Communism did in fact originate with the Jews.  For those unfamiliar with the early years of Communism, basically there were two branches, the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks, the Bolsheviks eventually winning out in that struggle.

      In this article Churchill refers to the Bolsheviks when he writes:  “This movement among the Jews is not new.  From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing.”

      We should point out that in this article Churchill is not claiming that all Jews are communist, that would be as absurd as claiming all communists are Jews.  What he is saying is that communism originated with the Jews, and that it is highly popular amongst them.  There are ample examples of Jews admitting the same. 

     What Churchill was trying to do, back in

1920, with this article was to persuade Jews to abandon communism and instead embrace the fledgling Zionist movement which sought to  give the Jews a homeland, and in turn, it was hoped, a national identity. To counter this fledgling movement, Stalin did in fact give the Jews an autonomous portion of the Soviet Union back in 1934, known officially as the Jewish Autonomous Oblast, or more familiarly as Birobidzhan. This is still in existence today.

     As for the RNPA, we do not consider ourselves “anti-Semitic” which in describing modern Jewry is a misnomer anyways.  Most modern Jews are not Semitic, but are descended from an Asiatic tribe known as Khazars that converted en masse to the religion of the Pharisees in 800 AD.  This was a forced conversion and came about after the Khazars lost a significant battle which the Khazar ruler determined was rooted in their paganism.  The Khazar Empire came to an end when a Russian prince Sviatoslav, decimated their Empire and spread the Jews across Europe. This was the beginning of the wandering Jew and thus, the cause of their Curse of Diaspora.

     That said, we view the Jews with dark suspicion because of their internationalist bent.  As a movement we see ourselves not as being anti-Jewish, but as being anti-communist. This is, to us, a reasonable defensive position.  As for the Zionist Jews, we question the wisdom of providing them with a homeland in the middle of hostile territory, especially in light of the fact that Birobidzhan was already in existence.  Israel itself was founded on terrorism and in fact has done some very treacherous acts including its attack of the USS Liberty which saw 34 Americans killed and 171 wounded.

     You may have wondered why you have never heard any of this, and the answer to that is that the Jews have insinuated themselves very heavily in the media and the book publishing business.  Spiro Agnew, former Vice President of the United States, had this to say regarding the former:      “The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish...I am referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and Newsweek magazines, The New York Times, Washington Post, and The International Herald Tribune...They are all Jews!”

     I am certain that you may now appreciate our point that the media is hostile to us and any other person, persons or groups that have a nationalistic viewpoint.  Getting your news about a racial nationalist group or event from the establishment media is like asking your cat how it feels about the neighborhood dog - the review is almost guaranteed not to be positive. 


     There is a tendency to make light of any talk of conspiracies.  The truth of the matter is that conspiracies happen all around us.  They happen from kindergarten on up as kids plot against the teacher, their parents and each other.  It is human nature, and in fact, part of the pecking order.  To take the position that this would not take place where there are much higher stakes such as trillions of dollars and/or global domination, is in the view of the RNPA, terribly naïve. As we have seen, Churchill saw communism as a “world-wide conspiracy”.

      For the longest time if you mentioned the Bilderbergs, the media would portray you as a “conspiracy nut”, implying that no such organization existed; however, demonstrations in Europe in recent years have brought exposure to this cabal of international financiers who seek to manipulate and control world events.  It was started in 1954, and the media only recently recognized its existence. 

     John Swinton, who was chief editorial writer of the New York Times had this to say: “There is no such thing in America as an independent press, unless it is out in country towns. You are all slaves. You know it, and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to express an honest opinion. If you expressed it, you would know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid $150 for keeping honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for doing similar things. If I should allow honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my paper, I would be like Othello before twenty-four hours: my occupation would be gone. The man who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street hunting for another job. The business of a New York journalist is to distort the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread, or for what is about the same — his salary. You know this, and I know it; and what foolery to be toasting an "Independent Press"! We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping-jacks. They pull the string and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”  

     And if those rich men tell you not to mention the Bilderbergs, or not to mention what Churchill wrote about the Jewish origins of Communism, or not to mention how Abraham Lincoln was a Champion of Black Repatriation, then you don’t mention it.  It’s as simple as that!  Political Correctness affected our media LONG before it infected our college campuses. In truth, the media are the carriers of this disease. And that, is the greatest of all conspiracies!  Instead of the Iron Curtain, we have a Paper Curtain, and it has silenced America like no communist dictator could.  And for those who don’t know, the communist revolution in Russia was financed by Jew communist financiers here in the United States, just as we now have a Hungarian Jew by the name of George Soros, financing and fomenting revolution in the streets of America. 


     There is a new form of White Guilt being promoted in the  controlled media: this is called White Privilege, and quite frankly, as a working class white man, I have no idea what they are talking about.  I think that what is really meant is Class Privilege, but some people see political advantage in race-baiting. 

     As I mentioned earlier, I lived on a farm for about eight years.  Those who may never have lived on a farm may not know the work involved and one can find forgiveness for their ignorance.  From the moment we took over that small ten acre farm, it was work.  Fields had to be cleared, crops had to be planted and cared for, animals fed and their stalls cleaned. My hands were blistered from hoeing and from shoveling manure.  I picked grapes for our neighbors for 2 cents a crate.  After my parents divorced, we returned to Buffalo.  My first job was one that I got through a summer youth program.  I got $1.65 an hour.  I had to take three buses to and from work.  They liked my work ethic and offered me a full time job, but instead I apprenticed at my Uncle’s bakery.  He paid me well, but I worked 6 days.  That meant often not going out with my friends on the weekend.  If this is White privilege, then sure, I am guilty of it.  Thank you Ms. Clinton for giving me this opportunity to respond to your elitism.  But please don’t misunderstand me, I live a contented life, but what little I have,  I earned, the old fashion way, and yes, I resent it when someone demeans my vocation, or judges me by themselves, or who wants to give what little I have, to someone else.  I think in this regard, I am pretty typical of most Americans.  I don’t think that makes me, or them, an extremist or a hater, although I do hate the hypocrisy of the Clintons, the Bushes, the Romneys and the other elitists who look down their noses at the common man. 

      With that I will conclude this address.  Thank you for your time and patience.